On 04/04/2014 11:44 AM, Peter Meerwald wrote: > >>> Peter and Arun, what's your opinion, is this a fair >>> requirement? What benefit would be significant enough? Which of these >>> (if any) would be sufficient? > >> Ok, what does Peter/Arun think about this? > > Tanu is starting to do some advertising :), this is good! > >>> 1) Automatic port switching when an application wants to play to an >>> inactive node: "paplay --routing=some-inactive-port-node foo.wav" >>> >>> 2) Support for loopback routing without loading module-loopback >>> manually: "pactl set-node-routing some-input-port-node >>> some-output-port-node" > > I think there is no point in keeping stuff separate forever; if it doesn't > terribly interfere with the current code, routing should be merged soon It does interfere a lot with the current code. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. https://launchpad.net/~diwic
