> > Peter and Arun, what's your opinion, is this a fair > > requirement? What benefit would be significant enough? Which of these > > (if any) would be sufficient? > Ok, what does Peter/Arun think about this? Tanu is starting to do some advertising :), this is good! > > 1) Automatic port switching when an application wants to play to an > > inactive node: "paplay --routing=some-inactive-port-node foo.wav" > > > > 2) Support for loopback routing without loading module-loopback > > manually: "pactl set-node-routing some-input-port-node > > some-output-port-node" I think there is no point in keeping stuff separate forever; if it doesn't terribly interfere with the current code, routing should be merged soon there is no other way to understand (and probably fix) whatever Tanu is doing; routing doesn't have to be 'perfect' I'd ask for code under test/ and a list of meaningful/useful examples (such as stated above) and can be checked and regression tested regards, p. -- Peter Meerwald +43-664-2444418 (mobile)