On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 00:19 -0300, Jo?o Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2013 11:25 AM, "Tanu Kaskinen" <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 15:06 -0300, jprvita at gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Jo?o Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita at openbossa.org>
> > >
> > > Create a structure pa_bluetooth_device to store information about the
> > > bluetooth device and utility functions to manipulate this structure.
> > > ---
> > > src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c | 84
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.h | 18 ++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c
> b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c
> > > index d5f1846..574a22d 100644
> > > --- a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c
> > > +++ b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c
> > > @@ -44,8 +44,86 @@ struct pa_bluetooth_discovery {
> > > pa_dbus_connection *connection;
> > > bool filter_added;
> > > pa_hook hooks[PA_BLUETOOTH_HOOK_MAX];
> > > + pa_hashmap *devices;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static pa_bluetooth_device*
> pa_bluetooth_discovery_create_device(pa_bluetooth_discovery *y, const char
> *path) {
> >
> > Static functions shouldn't have the "pa_bluetooth" prefix. Since this
> > seems to be a normal object allocation function, I'd use name
> > "device_new".
> >
>
> Ok, I didn't remember of this requirement in PA. I'll fix this and other
> occurrences of this problem for the next patch series.
If you haven't done this change yet, I propose that you do it in a
separate patch on top of the existing patch set, to make reviewing
easier (fewer changes in the existing patches).
The same goes for the pa_bluetooth/pa_bluez5 renaming, if you are going
to do that.
--
Tanu
