On 15 January 2013 07:41, Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it at gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/13/2013 03:02 PM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> On 11 January 2013 14:57, David Henningsson >> <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/11/2013 02:37 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 01/11/2013 02:04 PM, David Henningsson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This fixes a bug where pulseaudio would give up the device (due to >>>>> a request from JACK), but then immediately grab it again because >>>>> the monitor callback fired, telling that the device is now available. >>>>> >>>>> (Note: the protocol does not specify a timeout, i e if pulseaudio >>>>> is requested to give its device up but JACK does not grab the dbus >>>>> name, >>>>> at what point is PulseAudio allowed to re-grab it?) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is this a fix for the bug that is mentioned in this thread? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2012-November/015254.html >>> >>> >>> >>> Maybe, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was more than one thing that >>> needed fixing here. >>> >> >> Indeed, unfortunately applied to 2.1 this doesn't fix that particular >> problem (in fact stops 'test' playback in the phonon setup being >> played). The issue in the November thread may have been fixed in >> 2.99.3, or maybe my testing was inconsistent. (That it doesn't fix one >> particular error is of course not an objection to a patch that fixes >> others.) >> > Hi Ian, > > is this in conjuction with Tanu's patch as well? >From the ongoing discussion I gather both David and Tanu's patches do basically the same thing, and I hadn't tried applying both. When I noticed 2.99.3 worked I ran through a git bisect to find the commit I mentioned in the other email (cd1102cce01e47645ed03ddf46a0a8b80d65fc9e) which on its own applied to 2.1 avoids triggering the issue. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
