On 01/13/2013 03:02 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > On 11 January 2013 14:57, David Henningsson > <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote: >> On 01/11/2013 02:37 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: >>> >>> On 01/11/2013 02:04 PM, David Henningsson wrote: >>>> >>>> This fixes a bug where pulseaudio would give up the device (due to >>>> a request from JACK), but then immediately grab it again because >>>> the monitor callback fired, telling that the device is now available. >>>> >>>> (Note: the protocol does not specify a timeout, i e if pulseaudio >>>> is requested to give its device up but JACK does not grab the dbus name, >>>> at what point is PulseAudio allowed to re-grab it?) >>>> >>> >>> Is this a fix for the bug that is mentioned in this thread? >>> >>> >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2012-November/015254.html >> >> >> Maybe, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was more than one thing that >> needed fixing here. >> > > Indeed, unfortunately applied to 2.1 this doesn't fix that particular > problem (in fact stops 'test' playback in the phonon setup being > played). The issue in the November thread may have been fixed in > 2.99.3, or maybe my testing was inconsistent. (That it doesn't fix one > particular error is of course not an objection to a patch that fixes > others.) > Hi Ian, is this in conjuction with Tanu's patch as well? regards, Brendan
