With very low input sample rates the memory pool max block size may not be big enough, in which case we should return the size of one frame. Returning zero caused crashing. BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68616 --- src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/pulsecore/resampler.c b/src/pulsecore/resampler.c index 5599035..4480823 100644 --- a/src/pulsecore/resampler.c +++ b/src/pulsecore/resampler.c @@ -534,7 +534,23 @@ size_t pa_resampler_max_block_size(pa_resampler *r) { if (r->remap_buf_contains_leftover_data) frames -= r->remap_buf.length / (r->w_sz * r->o_ss.channels); - return ((uint64_t) frames * r->i_ss.rate / max_ss.rate) * r->i_fz; + block_size_max = ((uint64_t) frames * r->i_ss.rate / max_ss.rate) * r->i_fz; + + if (block_size_max > 0) + return block_size_max; + else + /* A single input frame may result in so much output that it doesn't + * fit in one standard memblock (e.g. converting 1 Hz to 44100 Hz). In + * this case the max block size will be set to one frame, and some + * memory will be probably be allocated with malloc() instead of using + * the memory pool. + * + * XXX: Should we support this case at all? We could also refuse to + * create resamplers whose max block size would exceed the memory pool + * block size. In this case also updating the resampler rate should + * fail if the new rate would cause an excessive max block size (in + * which case the stream would probably have to be killed). */ + return r->i_fz; } void pa_resampler_reset(pa_resampler *r) { -- 1.8.1.2
