On 07/18/2013 09:22 AM, Peter Meerwald wrote: > From: Peter Meerwald <p.meerwald at bct-electronic.com> > > useful for testing resampling > > Signed-off-by: Peter Meerwald <p.meerwald at bct-electronic.com> > --- > src/modules/module-sine.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/modules/module-sine.c b/src/modules/module-sine.c > index 573a7c0..3d97025 100644 > --- a/src/modules/module-sine.c > +++ b/src/modules/module-sine.c > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ PA_MODULE_VERSION(PACKAGE_VERSION); > PA_MODULE_LOAD_ONCE(false); > PA_MODULE_USAGE( > "sink=<sink to connect to> " > + "rate=<sample rate> " > "frequency=<frequency in Hz>"); > > struct userdata { > @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct userdata { > > static const char* const valid_modargs[] = { > "sink", > + "rate", > "frequency", > NULL, > }; > @@ -138,6 +140,11 @@ int pa__init(pa_module*m) { > ss.rate = sink->sample_spec.rate; > ss.channels = 1; > > + if (pa_modargs_get_value_u32(ma, "rate", &ss.rate) < 0 || ss.rate <= 1) { > + pa_log("Invalid rate specification"); > + goto fail; > + } Here's the same code from pa_modargs_get_sample_spec: if ((pa_modargs_get_value_u32(ma, "rate", &ss.rate)) < 0 || ss.rate <= 0 || ss.rate > PA_RATE_MAX) return -1; They should probably look the same or even be refactored into a common function (pa_modargs_get_rate)? -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. https://launchpad.net/~diwic