Resampling impreovements for GSOC'13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Peter,
  I have elaborated the points on the list.

3. Pass the resampling test cases in new environment.
I have found the test cases in the present code tree in
/src/tests/resampler.c where all combinations of sampling rate and sampling
format are tested. After refactoring the code, the old test cases should
pass.

> 3. Changing the resampling algorithm dynamically based on the scenario.
  Fixing the sampling rate, for different sources different resampling
algorithms can be used based on either CPU performance/Quality or both.


On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Peter Meerwald <pmeerw at pmeerw.net> wrote:

> Hello Dinesh,
>
> > I am very excited to work on Resampling projects and contribute to it. I
> > would like to list some of my ideas regarding that project.
> > 1. From the ideas page, i inferred that I have to refactor the present
> code
> > to use libavresample instead of current ffmpeg.
> > 2. I also found that, speex is obsolete and research whether new
> opus-tools
> > is better than speex in resampling . If so, refactor the code to use the
> > opus-tools.
>
> > 3. Pass the resampling test cases in new environment.
> > In addition to this, I would like to propose a new idea.
> > 3. Changing the resampling algorithm dynamically based on the scenario.
>
> can you please elaborate on item (3) and (3) :)
>
> what are criteria of passing a resampling test case?
> what scenarios for using different resampling algorithms are there?
>
> regards, p.
>
> --
>
> Peter Meerwald
> +43-664-2444418 (mobile)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20130422/d13315c3/attachment.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux