Am 23.10.2012 08:25, schrieb Arun Raghavan: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 13:32 +0200, Thomas Martitz wrote: >> Am 21.08.2012 08:51, schrieb R?mi Denis-Courmont: >>> Le mardi 21 ao?t 2012 00:50:34 Thomas Martitz, vous avez ?crit : >>>> There are tons of warnings, most of them because the function is not >>>> recognized as printf-like. >>> Removing checks looks very fishy. >>> >>> To use C99 and/or GNU format specifiers on MingW, you need to use the >>> gnuprintf attribute instead of printf. With printf, the format string is >>> validated according to the antiquated MSVC rules. >>> >> Interesting, I didn't know about gnuprintf. FWIW, what are those >> antiquated MSVC rules? I assumed the return value which isn't int for >> some affected functions? > Is this one going to be respun? > Yes, here you go. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-gccmacro-Work-around-warnings-due-to-printf-redirect.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1297 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20121023/5e04a72b/attachment.bin>
