On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 13:32 +0200, Thomas Martitz wrote: > Am 21.08.2012 08:51, schrieb R?mi Denis-Courmont: > > Le mardi 21 ao?t 2012 00:50:34 Thomas Martitz, vous avez ?crit : > >> There are tons of warnings, most of them because the function is not > >> recognized as printf-like. > > Removing checks looks very fishy. > > > > To use C99 and/or GNU format specifiers on MingW, you need to use the > > gnuprintf attribute instead of printf. With printf, the format string is > > validated according to the antiquated MSVC rules. > > > > Interesting, I didn't know about gnuprintf. FWIW, what are those > antiquated MSVC rules? I assumed the return value which isn't int for > some affected functions? Is this one going to be respun? -- Arun
