On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:26 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Tanu Kaskinen at 09/03/12 06:53 did gyre and gimble: > > I noticed that some parts of the public API are compiled twice: once as > > part of libpulse and once as part of libpulsecommon. Is there some > > wisdom in doing this that I'm unaware of? At least on my system things > > build and run fine also with the duplicates removed from libpulsecommon. > > Does it build from a clean clone too? > > I know there are very strange circular deps between the two libs, so my > only concern is that this double inclusion is needed to work around this. > > But basically if it passes a make distcheck then I guess it should be fine! It builds fine from a clean clone, and make distcheck passed after installing sshd (for ipacl-test) and fixing POTFILES. I've now pushed the patch. -- Tanu
