On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 16:40 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > On 04/17/2012 10:08 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > The option is pointless, as far as I can see. > > Actually, it is being used as a lookup key to well known descriptions. > > I believe we should > - let the "name" correspond to the file name and be a unique key > - replace "name" with something else, maybe "description-key" in lack > of a better idea, which is used as this lookup key > - after this is done, recheck how we do duplicates. There was a > routine that placed indices on names and descriptions if it found more > than one, but I might have broken it... :-/ I agree. I'll implement at least the description-key idea. -- Tanu
