Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:02 +0300, R?mi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 17:27:14 Arun Raghavan, vous avez ?crit :
> > Do you have any more details? Seems to be more of a policy daemon than
> > an audio server.
> 
> Isn't audio policy daemon just a fancier name for (modern) audio server?
> Does PulseAudio not implement audio policy?
> 
> Sure, PulseAudio certainly does not police video devices. That's partly done 
> by the X server (XVideo grabs), partly by the window manager, but mostly not 
> done at all.
> 
> But still...

Looking at what there is currently, there doesn't seem to be any trace
of a client interface. That would suggest that it won't handle the
actual audio stream data. Of course, the project is in a *very* early
stage, so the client interface bits might get added later.

In order to replace speculation with actual facts, I'll CC Taylor Hutt,
who seems to be doing the development. Taylor, would you possibly have
time to share some information about ADHD? For convenience, here's a
link to the beginning of this thread:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2011-September/011452.html

-- 
Tanu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux