Two different proposals (very drafty) on how to expose ports for inactive profiles, dunno which one is better. The first one adds a cross-reference struct which will repeat itself for every combination of port and profile. The second one adds a profile list for every port. The second one looks less ugly, but would bloat the network a little more as that would make pa_sink_port_info include the profile list as well. Both proposals add port lists to the card. The internal structure for this is coming soon to a patch near you. Both patches can also be combined with a patch that would merge pa_source_port_info and pa_sink_port_info into a single struct (for simplicity). Note: as some of you might remember, I tried adding a "ports" field to the pa_card_profile struct, but that broke the ABI as pa_card has a list that's depending on the size of pa_card_profile. // David -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 1_crossref.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 1075 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20111023/66ce1acd/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2_port_has_profile_list.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 1700 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20111023/66ce1acd/attachment-0001.bin>
