> > > I'm curious -- do you notice a perceivable difference between the two? I haven't built the system yet. I'd like to set it up correctly the first time. I would assume to not notice a difference right away. I imagine it similar to getting used to MP3 compression: at first, you don't notice anything weird with 128kbps, then you learn to recognize the artifacts, then you hate them. Or pictures that are blurry because they were resized and not postprocessed. I guess generically the best resampling filter is a windowed sinc filter, and I know that they are noticeable in image processing. I don't know yet if it's noticeable in audio, though. Pierre-Louis Bossart has a bunch of patches that should land in the next > major release that lets you dynamically switch sample rates on your > device (with some caveats). This should handle most cases that you care > about. > Yes, that would fit my use case nicely. I guess one could write plugins for media software to try to set the sample rate of the device. CC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20111008/b1a4ebe3/attachment.html>
