On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Paul Menzel <paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I just read the blog post > > ? ? ? ?Please use unambiguous tag names in your DVCS [1] > > which for security reasons suggests to use unambiguous tag names. > > Therefore I suggest to change our tag name scheme to the following. > > ? ? ? ?pa_0.9.22 or pa_1.0 That wouldn't be a problem once tag namespaces are supported: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/165799 -- Felipe Contreras
