On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 16:09 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 22/06/11 15:52 did gyre and gimble: > > Is this OK to do on the road to 1.0, or do we want to keep the > > description argument indefinitely? > > What are people's opinions? I'm happy for this to happen now. May as > well cut down on this kind of stuff. > > Arun, Tanu... WDYT? I'd prefer emitting warnings for a while before dropping the argument. After that I think the description arguments should still be recognized, but using them would cause loading the modules to fail with an informative error message. Then after a while the arguments could be dropped entirely. -- Tanu
