[RFC] Changing the way our saved database files are stored from blob to tagstruct.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:48 -0700, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 12:15 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> > 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 06/06/11 19:33 did gyre and gimble:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm intending on changing module-device-restore to store some elements
> > > of sink proplists (for Arun and Pierre's passthrough work in order to
> > > allow the user to specify what formats his receiver supports).
> > > 
> > > In order to do that, I need to be able to store an arbitrary sized chunk
> > > of data in the database. At present, all the files that use it are based
> > > on fixed sizes.
> > > 
> > > So in order to make this neater, I've converted the internal database
> > > reading/writing to use tagstructs. This allows us to version the data
> > > stored in the same way our protocol is versioned (while this isn't
> > > really awesome from a code perspective, at least it's extensible which
> > > is nice). At present when we change something we have to invalidate all
> > > old data. This way we can save some of it at least if we want to.
> > > 
> > > Of course during this transition, it's much simpler to just trash the
> > > old data and start again which is what I've done. If people are super
> > > opposed to this, I guess we could load the old format and transition it
> > > to the new format... let me know your opinions on this. Personally I
> > > don't really mind about losing the data this once (especially as we're
> > > moving to 1.0)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The memory management is a little more complicated now (the entries are
> > > no longer stack based as they are more dynamic), but otherwise the
> > > principles are identical. There will be marginally greater overhead but
> > > this isn't something that is done super often so I think that's permissible.
> > > 
> > > Please check the attached patch (particularly for memory leaks!)
> > 
> > OK, I've updated this patch here:
> > http://colin.guthr.ie/git/pulseaudio/log/?h=master-sv-tagstuct
> > 
> > This includes also another patch on for a protocol extension to
> > module-device-restore to allow us to save the formats it supports (this
> > will allow for manual configuration of receiver formats for passthrough).
> 
> Awesome!
> 
> > I've also added support for loading the legacy formats. I did this as a
> > separate commit as it should hopefully be easier to revert at a later date.
> 
> Awesome^{2}. :)
> 
> > If no objections on principle here I plan to merge this when I merge the
> > source-output volume branch which I hope to do soon so we can get some
> > test tarballs out and make a call for testing.
> 
> I'll try to take a quick look over the code this weekend or early next
> week, but if you don't hear from me by Mon/Tue, just push. :)

Did a quick review -- makes a lot of sense, and looks good!

Cheers,
Arun



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux