On 2011-01-31 12:41, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 31/01/11 10:46 did gyre and gimble: >> On 2011-01-31 10:41, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> Thanks for the update David :) >> >> You're welcome :-) >> >>>> PulseAudio #1 and #2: I believe these should be applied to PulseAudio >>>> upstream. >>> >>> OK, I think you've given it sufficient testing and exposer to confirm >>> this. Can I just ask if these are "safe" if the corresponding gst fixes >>> are not committed? (i.e. will GST generally bork or should it cope as >>> well as currently without it's patches?) >> >> Both are optimisations - gst patch only will be better than no patch at >> all, and PA patch only will be better than no patch at all. Most people >> will see it solved by either patch, but I guess that there are machines >> so slow that you'll need both. > > No worries, just wanted to make sure that it wasn't a "paired" updated - > e.g. the PA commits *required* the GST ones (I figured it was very > unlikely but with the Skype issue on the third patch, I figured I'd be > safer ask!) > >>> Also, master only or master+s-q >>> (I'm personally favouring the latter). >> >> Me too. > > OK, applied to my tree now with a tiny modification due to Lennart's > rate limit patch on s-q which I've now merged to master (with updates > for additional calls). > > Will push once I've done a few more bits and bobs. Thanks :-) This, and that Takashi agreed to take my ALSA patch in 2.6.38 as well (totally unrelated), this might actually turn out to be a really good day! :-) -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic
