On 2011-01-31 10:41, Colin Guthrie wrote: > Thanks for the update David :) You're welcome :-) >> PulseAudio #1 and #2: I believe these should be applied to PulseAudio >> upstream. > > OK, I think you've given it sufficient testing and exposer to confirm > this. Can I just ask if these are "safe" if the corresponding gst fixes > are not committed? (i.e. will GST generally bork or should it cope as > well as currently without it's patches?) Both are optimisations - gst patch only will be better than no patch at all, and PA patch only will be better than no patch at all. Most people will see it solved by either patch, but I guess that there are machines so slow that you'll need both. > Also, master only or master+s-q > (I'm personally favouring the latter). Me too. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic
