On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:04 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 18/02/11 09:41 did gyre and gimble: > > Hello! > > > > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > >> Hey folks, > >> I've put up a draft proposed API changes to get passthrough support to > >> the point where things Just Work? for at least the common cases, based > >> on previous discussion on-/off-list: > >> > >> http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/PassthroughSupport > >> > >> Please review/comment. Once we have some consensus, I'll send in patches > >> to actually get this done. > > > > I've updated this page with the changes discussed so far (and translated > > them into the actual API changes that we need). Please take a look and > > let me know if this looks acceptable. > > I've maybe missed the discussion, but is it worth having both: > pa_stream_new_extended > and > pa_stream_new_with_proplist_extended > > Doesn't the former just call the latter with a NULL proplist anyway? > > While I appreciate the symmetry with the existing API, I'd say avoid the > cruft and just call it pa_stream_new_extended() which implies both the > format and the proplist. WDYT? Good point - I agree with this. Also, fixed option c in the wiki. :) Cheers, Arun
