'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 18/02/11 09:41 did gyre and gimble: > Hello! > > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: >> Hey folks, >> I've put up a draft proposed API changes to get passthrough support to >> the point where things Just Work? for at least the common cases, based >> on previous discussion on-/off-list: >> >> http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/PassthroughSupport >> >> Please review/comment. Once we have some consensus, I'll send in patches >> to actually get this done. > > I've updated this page with the changes discussed so far (and translated > them into the actual API changes that we need). Please take a look and > let me know if this looks acceptable. I've maybe missed the discussion, but is it worth having both: pa_stream_new_extended and pa_stream_new_with_proplist_extended Doesn't the former just call the latter with a NULL proplist anyway? While I appreciate the symmetry with the existing API, I'd say avoid the cruft and just call it pa_stream_new_extended() which implies both the format and the proplist. WDYT? Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
