On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 15:19 +0300, Colin Guthrie wrote: > OK, so the manager object is separate but kept in the core? Seems fine > by me to keep things neatly separated. Yep. > I thinking of taking a pop at this at some point soon (if you don't beat > me to it), so can we decide on the name now? > > Anyone got any better naming suggestions? > > pa_imc_manager_* (Pro: short, Con: "Inter Module Comms" cryptic) > pa_extra_api_manager_* (Pro: clear, Con: long, Extension vs. Extra which > is which and for what purpose?) > pa_xapi_manager_* (Pro: short, Con: might be confused with X11) > pa_mxapi_manager_* (Pro: quite short, Con: "Module eXtension API" but > still quite cryptic) > > I'm not really blown away by any of them :s I'll vote for pa_imc_manager_*. -- Tanu
