[PATCH] call-state-tracker: New component.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 11:41 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 00:57 +0300, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
> > What are the users of this state tracker? Is it only some out-of-tree
> > Meego modules? Are you planning to submit those too? At least a
> > snippet of how it should be used would be nice.
> 
> The users are mentioned in call-state-tracker.h. I guess I should have
> said "See call-state-tracker.h for details." in the commit message.
> (Colin, feel free to add that sentence in the commit message, if you
> decide to accept this patch.) So yes, only some out-of-tree Meego
> modules use the call state tracker. About upstreaming those - there are
> no concrete plans that I'm aware of. I guess the only issue is that we
> are not confident that the code is clean enough...

I was reminded that we actually already have "libmeego-common" (a
support library for the out-of-tree modules) in the package that
provides the meego modules, and this feature would arguably fit better
in libmeego-common than libpulsecore. I would still like to see as much
stuff in upstream as possible, so I won't recommend that you reject the
patch, but it really isn't a big deal if you do.

-- 
Tanu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux