On Mon, 04.01.10 19:36, Colin Guthrie (gmane at colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > > 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 04/01/10 19:06 did gyre and gimble: > > I agree. > > > >> and that adding hooks to consolekit (if they don't exist) and the > >> concept of an "idle user" are probably more practical long term > >> solutions. > > > > "idle user"? By that you mean some pseudo user session that the > > speakup daemon could be run under? If so, I agree. > > Yeah, the idea I was generally blundering around was that the "idle > user" was a ck psuedo session that is "active" when no other session is > marked as active - e.g. while sitting at a tty login prompt. > > I don't know if the getty system could launch a psuedo session itself so > that ck doesn't specifically need to be aware of "idle" status - it was > just my way of imagineering how I'd approach the problem which (by the > sounds of things) was along the right lines (\o/) getty based logins are currently registered in CK by means of the PAM ckit connector. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
