On Thu, 28.05.09 04:53, Patrick Shirkey (pshirkey at boosthardware.com) wrote: > I think it is useful that you have the internal api calls so dbus is not > a requirement for communicating with PA. I am sorry to inform you that eventually PA will use D-Bus for client communication too. Already now building PA without D-Bus is not really supported anymore (read: noone bothers to check if those builds still compile). > - FYI, Stephane has clarified that the existing code that signals for PA > to suspend is part of the ALSA level code and is only tied to dbus > because that was the option chosen for communicating to PA. It almost > sounds like he was not aware of the API calls that are available. So > thanks for clarifying that point as it provides another option for > seamless integration of jack and PA. Have a link to the archives of this mail? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
