On Wednesday 27 May 2009 20:24:46 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 28.05.09 00:52, Patrick Shirkey (pshirkey at boosthardware.com) wrote: > > >> D-Bus is available under AFL and GPL2. AFL should be fine for LGPL > >> uses and GPL2 should be fine for GPL uses. Even companies like Nokia > >> who run closed source software on Linux are fine with D-Bus. > > > > After the past couple of days I think Nokia is probably a bad example to > > use for leadership in automated systems design. > > Leadership? Who said leadership? > > I am just using Nokia as one example here. Nokia has one of the more > extreme licensing policies, e.g. they don't use GPL3 software and so > on. But still, D-Bus is perfectly fine with them. > > If some JACK folks try to avoid D-Bus due to licensing reasons > regarding LGPL then they are apparently smoking something that is not > good for their health. ROFL.. Lennart... sometimes you speak untold wisdom :) Mark
