On Wed, 24.06.09 13:25, Diego E. ?Flameeyes? Petten? (flameeyes at gmail.com) wrote: > > I think this is deliberate for now - perhaps when udev >= 143 is not > > found? I guess the correct thing here would be to use the right module > > in default.pa depending on whether udev is detected or not? > > Probably, although probably the simpler thing would be to simply use > the .ifexists .else stuff a bit more... As pointed out on IRC, PA's current .ifexists implementaiton is not recursive, which is the reason why I didn't add the check for all three modules in the first place. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
