Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 08.10.08 21:06, Knut-H?vard Aksnes (kna at tirsdagsklubben.nu) wrote: > > >> Is it possible to set up the asynchronous API in such a way that >> latency information is updated before the first audio fragment appears, >> and ideally updated with every arriving audio segment? >> I am trying to merge the audio with video from other sources, and need >> precise latency information, within a tolerance of 15ms for the entire >> audio stream. >> > > No, this is unfortunately not possible. > > I thought about including timing information in every single PCM data > transfer. But there's nothing concrete yet. Sorry. > Including timing information in every PCM data transfer is exactly what I want. Please consider it again at a later stage, at the time being the existing timing information is probably "good enough" for my customer. (I am working as consultant.) The code I am working on will probably be made available under an open source license at a later stage when the code has been stabilized. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: kna.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 517 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20081026/d81a0878/attachment.vcf>
