Hey Lennart, I don't mean to rush, I really appreciate what you've done so far. I think we're sunk into this system now with a stable module API or not, so for better or worse, I'm going to have to develop this stuff. If I'm just going from 1 source to 1 sink, do I need to worry about deviating crystals? Won't they just read and write data at the pace that makes them happy, with the remainder sitting in a buffer? In any event, in my system our clocks shouldn't be too much of a problem, so I think I can hack something together. I guess we'll have to see. Justin On 7/11/07, Lennart Poettering <lennart at poettering.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 10.07.07 19:05, Justin Tulloss (jmtulloss at gmail.com) wrote: > > Hi! > > > Is there a good way of routing a source output straight to a sink? For > > instance, if I wanted the output of my microphone to be routed straight > to > > my speakers, how would I go about doing that in pulse? > > > > If there's not a way that exists now, could I easily write a module to > do > > so? > > This has been on my todo list for quite a while and has already been > requested multiple times. > > This stuff is not trivial, because sound card crystals usually deviate > and thus the stream data needs continuous adaptive resampling. We > already have something similar in module-combine, but due to the > current changes in our core its not worth it to port to over just yet. > > To guarantee optimal latency this should be done as a module for the > PA daemon. > > Please be patient! > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. > lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 > http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 > _______________________________________________ > pulseaudio-discuss mailing list > pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de > https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20070711/0f1f04ba/attachment.htm>
