On 7/3/2025 4:52 am, David E. Box wrote:
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 20:56 +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote:
On 6/3/2025 5:05 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 10:39 AM Choong Yong Liang
<yong.liang.choong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/3/2025 3:15 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 08:15:21PM +0800, Choong Yong Liang kirjoitti:
...
config DWMAC_INTEL
default X86
depends on X86 && STMMAC_ETH && PCI
depends on COMMON_CLK
+ depends on ACPI
Stray and unexplained change. Please, fix it. We don't need the
dependencies
which are not realised in the compile time.
The dependency on ACPI is necessary because the intel_pmc_ipc.h header
relies on ACPI functionality to interact with the Intel PMC.
So, that header has to be fixed as ACPI here is really unneeded
dependency for the cases when somebody (for whatever reasons) want to
build a kernel without ACPI support but with the driver enabled for
let's say PCI device.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Hi Andy,
Thank you for your feedback, Andy.
I appreciate your insights regarding the ACPI dependency.
The intel_pmc_ipc.h header is under the ownership of David E Box, who
focuses on the platform code, while my focus is on the netdev.
Hi David,
if you could kindly look into making the ACPI dependency optional in the
intel_pmc_ipc.h header, it would be greatly appreciated.
I am more than willing to provide any support necessary to ensure a smooth
resolution.
Choong you only need put the function under a #if CONFIG_ACPI block and provide
an alternative that returns an error when the code is not build. Like this,
#if CONFIG_ACPI
static inline int intel_pmc_ipc(struct pmc_ipc_cmd *ipc_cmd, struct pmc_ipc_rbuf
*rbuf)
{
...
}
#else
static inline int intel_pmc_ipc(struct pmc_ipc_cmd *ipc_cmd, struct pmc_ipc_rbuf
*rbuf) { return -ENODEV; }
#endif
David
This patch series has already been accepted, but we recognize the
importance of addressing this issue in the next patch series for upstream.
Our goal is to ensure that the driver can be compiled and function
correctly in both ACPI and non-ACPI environments.
Thank you both for your understanding and collaboration.
Hi Andy and David,
Thank you for the feedback.
The current ACPI dependency for the config DWMAC_INTEL is necessary, but I
agree on making it optional.
Implementing the suggestion from David using the "#if CONFIG_ACPI" approach
would address your concern about users who need to build a kernel without
ACPI support.
If you are okay with this approach, then I will submit the solution for
upstream.
