> The documentation says to look at platform_profile_choices. To > determine what is supported. FWIW this is exactly what > power-profiles-daemon does. Yeah, this one is minor all things considered. Since there is a justification. Even if user error is not the best of justifications. But as I maintain a userspace TDP tool, I can tell you that if the other issue is not fixed, /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile is no longer trustworthy due to being able to occlude platform profiles. So a mitigation will be needed for all userspace power utilities. But there is actually very little use currently for /sys/class/platform-profile as AMD pmf is mostly a NOOP, so I think this would be premature and should be avoided. While I do not have a large portfolio of ACPI collections for Thinkpads, HP, Alienware, and Dell that have WMI drivers, I can see amd-pmf popping up on a lot of the late 2024 models of GPD, Ayaneo, Lenovo, and Asus, and going into 2025. So it is worthwhile fixing this now once and for all. Antheas