On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:44:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It appears that PWM instantiated from pinctrl-intel is configured > to a wrong flow. This mini-series to fix the issue. Note, patch 1 > is comprehensive documentation paragraph to explain what the difference > in the programming flow and what the SoCs are affected. > > The issue had been reported privately, hence no Closes tag. > I haven't added the Tested-by, so to make sure that it (still) works > I ask Alexis to give the formal Tag here in a response to the series. > > The idea is to route this via pin control tree as there are already two patches > against PWM handling in pinctrl-intel. There is no need to backport that, it's > optional, because it wasn't worked from day 1, and hence no Cc: stable@. > > Cc: Alexis GUILLEMET<alexis.guillemet@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Andy Shevchenko (2): > pwm: lpss: Clarify the bypass member semantics in struct > pwm_lpss_boardinfo > pinctrl: intel: Fix wrong bypass assignment in > intel_pinctrl_probe_pwm() Both, Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
