On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> APMF spec has a newer section called the APTS (AMD Performance and
> Thermal State) information, where each slider/power mode is associated
> with an index number.
>
> Add support to get these indices for the Static Slider.
>
> Co-developed-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c | 10 +++++++
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> index 0fc8ad0ac3e9..28df45c058db 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,16 @@ int is_apmf_func_supported(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev, unsigned long index)
> return !!(pdev->supported_func & BIT(index - 1));
> }
>
> +int apmf_get_static_slider_granular_v2(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev,
> + struct apmf_static_slider_granular_output_v2 *data)
> +{
> + if (!is_apmf_func_supported(pdev, APMF_FUNC_STATIC_SLIDER_GRANULAR))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return apmf_if_call_store_buffer(pdev, APMF_FUNC_STATIC_SLIDER_GRANULAR,
> + data, sizeof(*data));
> +}
> +
> int apmf_get_static_slider_granular(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev,
> struct apmf_static_slider_granular_output *data)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 5cad11369697..b27e96aeac23 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
> #define MAX_OPERATION_PARAMS 4
>
> #define PMF_IF_V1 1
> +#define PMF_IF_V2 2
>
> struct sbios_hb_event_v2 {
> u16 size;
> @@ -264,6 +265,17 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
> u16 pmf_if_version;
> };
>
> +struct apmf_sps_prop_granular_v2 {
> + u8 ac_best_perf;
> + u8 ac_balanced;
> + u8 ac_best_pwr_efficiency;
> + u8 ac_energy_saver;
> + u8 dc_best_perf;
> + u8 dc_balanced;
> + u8 dc_best_pwr_efficiency;
> + u8 dc_battery_saver;
I started to wonder if these could be made into an two element array with
4xu8 in each, one for AC and DC because it would simplify some other code
in the subsequent patches (and perhaps even in this patch)?
--
i.
