On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Armin Wolf wrote: > The policy buffer is allocated using normal memory allocation > functions, so readl() should not be used on it. > > Compile-tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > index 16973bebf55f..70d09103ab18 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > @@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) > u32 cookie, length; > int res; > > - cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET); > - length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN); > + cookie = dev->policy_buf[POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET]; > + length = dev->policy_buf[POLICY_COOKIE_LEN]; Hmm, the next question is, is it okay to get just 8 bits instead the full dword (the policy_buf is unsigned char *)? -- i.
