Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Suma Hegde wrote:

> AMD EPYC family 0x1A and Model 0x0-0xF are having different
> mailbox message ID offset compared to previous
> platforms. In case of ACPI based BIOS, this information will be read
> from ACPI table, for non-ACPI BIOS, this needs to be #defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>"
> Changes since v2:
> 1. Change "non ACPI" to "non-ACPI"
> 2. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> index 46924c572055..cc5e5e8124c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>   */
>  #define SMN_HSMP_BASE		0x3B00000
>  #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID		0x0010534
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_F1A_M0H	0x0010934
>  #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP	0x0010980
>  #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA	0x00109E0
>  
> @@ -712,6 +713,15 @@ static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(u16 sock_ind)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool is_f1a_m0h(void)
> +{
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x1A &&
> +	    (boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x00 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0x0F))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
> @@ -725,10 +735,19 @@ static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
>  		sock->sock_ind			= i;
>  		sock->dev			= dev;
>  		sock->mbinfo.base_addr		= SMN_HSMP_BASE;
> -		sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off		= SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID;
> +		sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * This is a tranisitional change from non-ACPI to ACPI, only

transitional ?


-- 
 i.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux