On 9/18/2023 9:29 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > In this case it is not just about the bitfield itself nor the bit > allocation order but sharing the storage unit with another member, and to > further complicate things, members have different alignment requirement > too (32-bit aligned u8 followed by u32 bitfield). > I too verified that the size of the whole structure matches that of MSR 64 bits (8 bytes). Initially when IFS scan was added the all MSR structure members were bit-fields, later there was a suggestion to use basic C types if applicable during subsequent Array BIST patch series. I followed this approach with the current patch series . I will change the current series to use all bit-field MSR structures in v2, given mixing basic types and bitfields is a a source of confusion Jithu
