On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 01:33:50PM -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> IMHO option 1 is following the microcode precedent of having the kernel
> construct the filename based on the {x86,model,stepping} fields of
> struct cpuinfo_x86.
You can't follow the microcode precedent if you have more than one file.
> I think option 2 isn't really doing the user any favors. Having them
> feed all the *.scan files they find in /lib/firmware/intel/ifs_0 to the
> driver to see which ones work becomes progressively worse in every CPU
> generation. Any script/app running tests is likely to do the ff-mm-ss
> filter itself ... so why have the kernel do it too?
So you think that feeding a sequence number is more intuitive?
I guess I've given all my arguments here but you folks don't see things
this way.
I guess time will show whether the sequence number thing was a good
idea.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
