On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 01:21:41PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I'm assuming that the kernel would provide different error conditions for > those. But handling those in shell scripting is very difficult: you'd need to > start a subshell and parse stderr. You call that "very difficult"?! > And this is part of my argument of why it's unlikely people will use their > shells to do this. That shell function is easily another 10 lines of > scripting, if it's meant to do its job properly. To make that easier, we've > developed two tools, one of them the OpenDCDiag tool I linked to, but both > just happen to be written in C and C++ instead of shell. I've told you already that having a special tool is always more problematic. I guess you'll make your own experience distributing it but if you see pushback and people start complaining, you shouldn't wonder why. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette