RE: [PATCH 03/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: return a more appropriate Error code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Do the first 3 patches need a 'Fixes' tag? Or is the idea here that the 
> feature isn't truly enabled so everything before removing the BROKEN tag 
> will be considered together?

No point in back porting a "Fix" to a stable release that still marks the
driver as BROKEN

-Tony






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux