Re: [PATCH 03/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: return a more appropriate Error code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21/2022 1:34 PM, Jithu Joseph wrote:
scan_chunks_sanity_check() was returning -ENOMEM if it encounters
an error while copying IFS test image from memory to Secure Memory.


Same as before:

s/was returning/returns

Return -EIO in this scenario, as it is more appropriate.


Do the first 3 patches need a 'Fixes' tag? Or is the idea here that the feature isn't truly enabled so everything before removing the BROKEN tag will be considered together?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux