On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:00:38AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:08 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 5/10/22 17:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > I must admit I have lost track of all the Ack-s / Reviewed-by-s a bit. > > > > > > So from the above I take it that the Ack-s resp. Reviewed-by-s on the > > > other non drivers/platform/x86 bits also signal an Ack to merge the entire > > > series through the pdx86 tree? > > > > > > Lee, any chance you can take a look at patches 3-5 and give your Ack > > > for merging these through the pdx86 tree together with the rest? > > > > Actually I misinterpreted Lee's different tags again. Acked-by is > > normal for routing MFD code via other subsystems, while > > Acked-for-MFD-by is for Lee (scripts?) to route the code via MFD tree. > > Lee, is it the correct interpretation now? > > Yes, that is correct. Thanks for clarification. I'm learning hard way :-) > I just replied to your 0th patch (before I saw this, sorry). Thanks for the tag. So, it seems we all set to route this via MFD then. Do you think we can go? Or do need to postpone this to be after v5.19-rc1? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
