On Wed, 11 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:08 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/10/22 17:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > ... > > > I must admit I have lost track of all the Ack-s / Reviewed-by-s a bit. > > > > So from the above I take it that the Ack-s resp. Reviewed-by-s on the > > other non drivers/platform/x86 bits also signal an Ack to merge the entire > > series through the pdx86 tree? > > > > Lee, any chance you can take a look at patches 3-5 and give your Ack > > for merging these through the pdx86 tree together with the rest? > > Actually I misinterpreted Lee's different tags again. Acked-by is > normal for routing MFD code via other subsystems, while > Acked-for-MFD-by is for Lee (scripts?) to route the code via MFD tree. > Lee, is it the correct interpretation now? Yes, that is correct. I just replied to your 0th patch (before I saw this, sorry). > ... > > > p.s. > > > > Since this is mostly a cleanup series and since we are getting close > > to the next merge-window I believe that it likely is best to merge > > this after 5.19-rc1 has been released. > > OK. > > > I can then also provide > > an immutable branch for other maintainers early on in the 5.19 > > cycle which should help to avoid merge conflicts. > > I guess I will send a v6 anyway in order to attach Henning's series to mine. > -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
