Hi,
On 12/25/21 15:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 1:55 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Driver for the external-charger IRQ pass-through function of the
>> Bay Trail Crystal Cove PMIC.
>
> Intel Bay Trail (same in the code)
Ack will fix before merging.
>> Note this is NOT a power_supply class driver, it just deals with IRQ
>> pass-through, this requires this separate driver because the PMIC's
>> level 2 interrupt for this must be explicitly acked.
>>
>> This new driver gets enabled by the existing X86_ANDROID_TABLETS Kconfig
>> option because the x86-android-tablets module is the only user of the
>> exported external-charger IRQ.
>
> ...
>
>> drivers/platform/x86/crystal_cove_charger.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I'm wondering why it's not under the intel/ subfolder. Do we expect to
> have the same PMIC used on other x86 vendors?
I was wondering about doing this myself before submitting this upstream,
since you have the same idea, lets go for it. I'll move this before
merging it.
>
> ...
>
>> +static int crystal_cove_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>
> Adding
>
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> may increase readability a bit and perhaps reduce the amount of LOCs.
Normally I'm a fan of doing that myself, but it doesn't really help
here since there are only a few references and those fit in 1 line.
Regards,
Hans
