Hi, On 12/7/20 8:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:46 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 12/2/20 6:11 PM, Mark Pearson wrote: >>> On modern systems the platform performance, temperature, fan and other >>> hardware related characteristics are often dynamically configurable. The >>> profile is often automatically adjusted to the load by some >>> automatic-mechanism (which may very well live outside the kernel). >>> >>> These auto platform-adjustment mechanisms often can be configured with >>> one of several 'platform-profiles', with either a bias towards low-power >>> consumption or towards performance (and higher power consumption and >>> thermals). >>> >>> Introduce a new platform_profile sysfs API which offers a generic API for >>> selecting the performance-profile of these automatic-mechanisms. >>> >>> Co-developed-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Thank you, patches 1 and 2 look good to me now, you may add my: >> >> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> To patch 2 (since I'm co-author of patch 1 it would be a bit weird >> to add it there too). >> >> Rafael, it would be great if you pick up patches 1 and 2 for merging >> into 5.11 (assuming that you agree that they are ready) then I will merge >> patch 3 once 5.11-rc1 is out. > > I've applied patch [1/2] (as 5.11-rc material) for now, but I still > needed to fix it up somewhat. Please check the result in my > bleeding-edge branch. Thank you. > I'll get to the other patch tomorrow. The other patch likely conflicts with a bunch of other thinkpad_acpi changes already in pdx86/for-next; and I still need to review v5 of it, so please do not apply it. I will pick it up after 5.11-rc1 and send it out as part of a pull-req for rc2. Regards, Hans
