On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:46 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 12/2/20 6:11 PM, Mark Pearson wrote: > > On modern systems the platform performance, temperature, fan and other > > hardware related characteristics are often dynamically configurable. The > > profile is often automatically adjusted to the load by some > > automatic-mechanism (which may very well live outside the kernel). > > > > These auto platform-adjustment mechanisms often can be configured with > > one of several 'platform-profiles', with either a bias towards low-power > > consumption or towards performance (and higher power consumption and > > thermals). > > > > Introduce a new platform_profile sysfs API which offers a generic API for > > selecting the performance-profile of these automatic-mechanisms. > > > > Co-developed-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you, patches 1 and 2 look good to me now, you may add my: > > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To patch 2 (since I'm co-author of patch 1 it would be a bit weird > to add it there too). > > Rafael, it would be great if you pick up patches 1 and 2 for merging > into 5.11 (assuming that you agree that they are ready) then I will merge > patch 3 once 5.11-rc1 is out. I've applied patch [1/2] (as 5.11-rc material) for now, but I still needed to fix it up somewhat. Please check the result in my bleeding-edge branch. I'll get to the other patch tomorrow. Thanks!
