Hi,
On 12/2/20 9:50 PM, Ernst, Justin wrote:
>> Return -ENOMEM on allocation failure instead of returning success.
>>
>> Fixes: 4fc2cf1f2daf ("x86/platform/uv: Add new uv_sysfs platform driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to find this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@xxxxxxx>
> (With an acknowledgement of Boris's 's/success/random stack memory contents/' comment)
ATM the drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c only exists in the tip/x86 tree -next
branch, so this fix needs to be merged through the tip/x86 tree, here is my ack
for merging it that way:
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
(either with a fixed up commit-msg as suggested by Borislav, or feel
free to add it to a fixed v2 of the patch)
Regards,
Hans
>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c b/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
>> index 54c342579f1c..e17ce8c4cdad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/uv_sysfs.c
>> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static int uv_hubs_init(void)
>> uv_hubs[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(*uv_hubs[i]), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!uv_hubs[i]) {
>> i--;
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err_hubs;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.29.2
>
