On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 6:45 PM Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Andy, > > please excuse me that I am writing to you personally. > > A patch series[1] has been submitted to the platform-driver-x86 list before I subscribed to that list, so I cannot react to it in the form of a reply, JFYI: patchwork allows you to download messages in mbox format which most of MUA allows to use and reply to. I'm Cc'ing this to a mailing list. > so I resorted to writing to you personally, since you were the last (and only) person to react to that series. > > Patchwork shows its state as "Changes requested", but I don't see any comments on v3 of the series. Can you please take a look and explain what needs to be done for it to be merged? As pointed out during v2 review [2] the work is needed to be done, i.e. "Don't forget to update any documentation if needed." So I'm waiting for either v4 with documentation update, or a comment explaining why it's not needed (however, I don't believe we shouldn't update it, b/c at least we shall mark the old interface obsolete and give people reference to a new (standard) one). Sorry if it wasn't clear. In any case it requires v4 for the matter of rebase to the latest code base. > [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11362557/ [2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11359999/ -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
