Am Freitag, den 10.07.2020, 23:46 +0300 schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:24 PM Armas Spann < > zappel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2020, 22:19 +0300 schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:18 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > < > > > andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 3:02 PM Armas Spann < > > > > zappel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Support for the currently unsupported ASUS G14 Notebooks (GA401I > > > > > series) > > > > > to the asus(-nb)-wmi.c sources. > > > > > First change is the on the input buffer, the new devices are sending 5 > > > > > DWORD instead of 3 as it was definded before. (might be already > > > > > submitted > > > > > upstream) > > > > > > > > > > The second part of the patch adds the correct device dmi > > > > > identificator. > > > > > > > > I can't take patch w/o Signed-off-by. See [1] for the details. > > > > > > > > On top of that it doesn't apply. And it clashes with already applied > > > > 7b91f1565fbf ("platform/x86: asus_wmi: Reserve more space for struct > > > > bias_args") > > > > > > [1]: > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks for your feedback. > > I must excuse myself for not beeing guideline conform. > > > > Now, I removed the already fixed input_buffer and added the ASUS Zephyrus > > ROG > > G502I Series as well. > > > > Corrected patch: > > Good. Now you need to do it so: > - it has proper and clear commit message (and being committed locally) > - you commit change with `git commit -a -s` which adds correctly the > Signed-off-by tag > - with help of `git format-patch -v<N> -1 HEAD~0` you create a file > with patch, where `<N>` corresponds to the version of it, now I guess > it's something like 3 or 4 > - you open that file in editor and add a changelog after cutter '---' > line, save it > - with help of `git send-email 0001-*` you can send that patch to the > mailing lists (don't forget to Cc maintainers as well) > > Many thanks for this brief explanation. I hope that I did it now correct, so I'm not wasting more of your time. (the email was just sent via git) Best Regards,Armas Spann