On 5/21/20 7:25 AM, Michael Shych wrote:
> Hi Andy, Guenter,
>
> Did you understand to which branch it will be better to take this patchset?
>
I created an immutable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git watchdog-mlx-immutable
Guenter
> Thanks,
> Michael.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 7:14 PM
>> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-
>> watchdog.org>; Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Darren Hart
>> <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Platform Driver
>> <platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vadim Pasternak
>> <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] support watchdog with longer timeout period
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:09 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 5/4/20 7:14 AM, michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> From: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>>> Michael Shych (4):
>>>> platform_data/mlxreg: support new watchdog type with longer timeout
>>>> period
>>>> platform/x86: mlx-platform: support new watchdog type with longer
>>>> timeout
>>>> watchdog: mlx-wdt: support new watchdog type with longer timeout
>>>> period
>>>> docs: watchdog: mlx-wdt: Add description of new watchdog type 3
>>>>
>>>> Documentation/watchdog/mlx-wdt.rst | 10 ++++
>>>> drivers/platform/x86/mlx-platform.c | 106
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/watchdog/mlx_wdt.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>> include/linux/platform_data/mlxreg.h | 5 +-
>>
>>> Guess the big question is now which branch to use to take this series.
>>> Thoughts, anyone ?
>>
>> count(watchdog) = 8
>> count(platform) = 6
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> With Best Regards,
>> Andy Shevchenko
